Some Yankee fans are advocating the Yankees go to arbitration with Chien Ming Wang and give him $4+ million just on the chance he may come back at some point in 2010.
Well, if we’re going to take a chance on an oft-injured pitcher, why not take it on a pitcher that makes Chien Ming Wang look like fecal matter? We’re talking about the pitcher whose body is held together by duct tape, Rich Harden.
Before everyone flips out and yells at us for advocating the signing of a starting pitcher who has only reached 150 innings once in his 7-year career, especially since we lambasted the AJ Burnett signing, just give us a second.
Obviously it all comes down to price, and we’re not saying the Yankees should sign Harden at all costs. Looking over the internets, we haven’t seen any mentions of what Harden is looking for, so all we can do now is speculate.
But, the economy is still terrible and you figure most organizations will be acting frugal, so the idea of signing an injury-prone pitcher to a substantial deal is a financial risk most teams won’t want to take. Thus, Harden may not be in a position to demand major dollars, and perhaps the Yankees can scoop him up on a reasonable, even incentive-based deal and assume the risk. Considering the Yankees have a tentative rotation (assuming Pettitte is re-signed) of Sabathia-Burnett-Pettitte-Hughes-Joba and some other options in reserve, it’s not like you’d be looking for a 200-inning horse in Harden. You could sign him to a deal somewhat reflective of what you would expect from him. Plus, the Yankees somehow got 200+ innings out of Burnett this season, so perhaps they could work their Mr. Myagi healing tactics on Harden.
Over the last two seasons, Harden has made 51 starts over 289 IP, which is the most innings he’s pitched in back-to-back seasons since 2004-2005. Over this stretch, he struck out 352 hitters for a video game-like K/9 of 11.0 and a K/BB of 2.72. All of this was good for an ERA+ of 145 (3.05 ERA)!! When Harden is healthy, he is one of the best pitchers in the game.
He was shut down at the end of 2009, but according to Harden and his agent, Arn “Anderson” Tellem, it was not due to injury (grain of salt):
“He’s fine,” Tellem said. “If the team had been in the race, he would have been pitching. No health issues at all.”
Harden has been healthier over the past 2 seasons, and even if the Yankees can only get the 140 innings he’s averaged over that time, they’d be getting 140 innings from one of the best pitchers in baseball. Again, we’re not saying the Yankees should write Harden a blank check, but if there is any team can take advantage of the still terrible economy and accept the financial risk of acquiring a high-risk, sky-high reward pitcher like Harden, it’s the 27-time World Champions.

Yes, he spends more time in a hospital than on a pitcher’s mound, but the Yankees wouldn’t need him to be an innings-eater.



30 Comments
Matcohen November 15, 2009 23:07
It’s an interesting idea. I wonder if the Yanks could do a 3 man troika for the final 2 rotation spots with Joba, Phil and Harden each starting 2/3 of the year and relieving 1/3. Harden would be a monster out of the pen.
Harden’s FIP of 4.35 (in the NL) last year was not encouraging.
And he has control problems – do we really want a second (less healthy) version of AJ?
Doug Chu November 15, 2009 23:11
He’s a 5-inning pitcher in the NL Central at this point. Normally I’d be cool with buying low on Harden, but he’s not just a risk to miss time on the DL, he’s also not durable enough to go deep into games.
I’ll take Justin Duchscherer first out of any pitcher reclamation projects.
Matcohen November 15, 2009 23:13
Oh and buying low on projects like Harden, Penny and Smoltz isn’t something that the Yanks are smart enough to do. Only Theo has the requisite talent to pull that off.
iYankees November 15, 2009 23:27
He had a tear in his rotator cuff prior to the 2009 season, opting for rehab and rest rather than surgery. For that reason, I’m hesitant to cast my vote of “confidence” in Harden’s favor. I even heard that he scrapped hits breaking pitches in order to alleviate the pain he felt (he was strictly fastball changeup). Not sure if that’s true, as I don’t have the numbers here, but I would pass on Harden, despite his tantalizing stuff.
Business Suit November 15, 2009 23:49
Duchscherer put up his best numbers at age 30 (so he’d be 32) with a career BABIP of .235 – he’s not a reclamation project he’s an anomalous season.
And Harden last year was the opposite, with by far his highest career BABIP and way more HR allowed than ever. Maybe he did something to earn that, but his 10.9 K/9 suggests otehrwise. On top of that he’s 4 years younger. Gotta take a flyer on a one or 2 year deal.
adam November 16, 2009 00:09
i love the idea personally, you can never have enough pitching and while it’s a risk for sure, its a risk that could pay some serious dividends for us. the guy has unbelievable stuff and unlike burnett when he’s healthy has proven to be an above average pitcher. love the move, if he’s affordable i say do it
My Pet Goat November 16, 2009 00:09
The love that dare not speak its name… Thank you for broaching this difficult subject.
ken November 16, 2009 00:17
wouldn’t Ben Sheets be a better option?
Andrew November 16, 2009 00:57
I agree with Ken. What’s your take on signing Sheets to an incentive laden deal as opposed to Harden?
Kevin S. November 16, 2009 01:45
I agree going to arbitration with CMW is a bad idea, but what about non-tendering him then trying to bring him back on a minor-league deal. He may not have been as good as Harden, but his entire injury history stems from that foot injury. Last year, we didn’t have the option of letting him pitch his way into shape in the minors. This way, he could work himself back without being rushed up. Maybe he’s irreparably damaged, but I wouldn’t give up on him just yet.
bartonbickle November 16, 2009 02:14
when signing a player like this to a low risk/high reward contract it’s virtually impossible to lose
if he won’t command more than say $8M per than there is literally no reason not to do this
i still say they should bring wang back, though. too much pitching never hurt anyone, and it’s not like pettitte is sticking around for too long.
DFunk014 November 16, 2009 04:16
So then why not sign Ben Sheets also? Low salary, incentive based…
AndrewYF November 16, 2009 08:50
The only way this would be a good idea is if the Yankees were not relying on one inning out of him. The mistake the Red Sox made in the Penny/Smoltz disasters was that they didn’t have nearly the depth everyone said they did, and they needed their arms.
George251 November 16, 2009 10:35
SHEETS. You’re talking about one of the elite pitchers in baseball with masterful stuff when he’s healthy. If the Yanks are gunna go down the injury-prone brick road, Go for the Gold! Don’t settle for silver.
Jimmy November 16, 2009 10:39
how is sheets better than harden when both are healthy?
ej877 November 16, 2009 10:39
I think Sheets would be an excellent addition.
His abilities would fit well on the field,
and his personality would fit perfectly in the clubhouse.
Don’t forget Erik Bedard as well, who would be as good as any mid rotation starter in baseball.
What disturbs me is the lack of credit due to CM Wang, I would not be so hasty to throw him on the scrap pile just yet. I mean come on, he’s a homegrown product who happened to be our ace for two seasons, now were discussing spending more money on other pitchers who are an injury risk.
Jimmy November 16, 2009 11:50
Sheets and Harden blow Wang away if they’re all healthy
Joseph November 16, 2009 15:48
I agree wouldn’t Sheets be a better option??
Jimmy November 16, 2009 16:39
peak Harden is better than peak Sheets
Brian Chasman November 16, 2009 22:08
Was this suppose to be a joke? Harden’s arm is ready to fall off. The guy’s shoulder is a mess.
Fellas, let me work on #28. You nomaas guys go back to searching for porn. Cause you suck at baseball.
SleapeeHed November 17, 2009 09:59
Rich Harden? Ben Sheets? Seriously, people? Why don’t we just complete the trifecta and sign Mark Prior while we’re at it..
Jimmy November 17, 2009 10:23
you two guys are missing the point of the entire article
Thurman November 17, 2009 15:11
If either Harden or Sheets is signed, it can have a major upside b/c they won’t be at the front of the rotation and can take it easy. The pressure to live up to the hype won’t be nearly as tough, kinda like Burnett not being the no.1 starter for the yanks as he would have been if he had signed with atlanta.
As long as the deal is incentive laden, then what do we have to lose? Jon Lieber gave the yanks a pretty good season and he didn’t cost them a whole lot. Won’t know till the season is over.
skobak November 18, 2009 19:04
The Yanks should get him because they need to keep either Joba or Hughes in the pen. The most compelling reason to get Harden is the potential for awesome headlines in NY tabloids. When Harden slips up in a press conference, the Post’s backpage will say “Hard On.” If he gets hammered by, say, Seattle, the headline will say “Hard-On gets Blown” or “Mariners Pound Hard-On”
For a well-pitched game against Seattle: “Harden nails Mariners.”
Pingback: Forget Rich Harden | The iYankees Blog - A New York Yankees Blog
Pingback: For the record… « The Payoff
cheap apple IPad February 8, 2011 23:58
I completely agree with your assessment. Essentially, most people would agree with you but would be scared to convey that they do.
Water Damage February 13, 2011 22:50
Thanks for the wonderful post. I look forward to reading your future posts.
Marcelo Fitchette February 15, 2011 21:54
Thank you so much for sharing all of the good content! I am looking forward to reading more posts.
Noemi Dintino February 21, 2011 21:28
Great write up, saved your site with hopes to see more information!