With limited spending pools imposed by the new CBA, one of the clear themes that emerged from the draft was teams drafting college seniors, particularly in rounds 6-10, so that they could:

a. Save money for later rounds
b. Not lose the money allocated to those picks (if a team doesn’t sign a player selected in the first 10 rounds, they lose that money to spend)

We just spoke with a player agent who were are very close with. He had 4 players selected in the just-completed MLB draft. According to him, college seniors are being offered to eat corn the long way.

For example, a particular National League team selected a college pitcher in the 10th round. According to the new CBA, that round is a $125,000 slot. The National League team gave this pitcher $5,000. Thus, that team saved $120,000 that they can now allocate elsewhere, and because they technically signed their 10th round pick, they don’t lose the money. This agent has seen a couple senior signings in the $25,000 range, but that’s the high-end of offers!

In other words, college seniors are being used as draft fodder in an attempt to game the system. It’s so blatant that this agent told us “MLB teams should be embarrassed about how they treat seniors.

He elaborated too, saying that while college seniors never had leverage, the offers were “fairer” in previous years. For example, in the last two drafts, it wasn’t unusual to see college seniors with $40,000-$45,000 bonuses. With the new CBA rules, teams are looking to save money at every opportunity, and the offers to college seniors are much lower this year.

While anyone could make a valid argument that this is a smart strategy employed by teams, it certainly isn’t the most ethical move.

Oh well, we wanted to bring you this information direct from a NoMaasian source. And speaking of NoMaasian sources, we had a conversation today with Yankees Senior VP Mark Newman about the draft. We’ll be posting that interview on Sunday night.