Back in June, we highlighted the Yankees’ spotty track record when it came to first round picks in recent years. Yet, as we noted then, the Yankees always pick towards the end of the first round when all the elite talents are gone and the draft is, according to Mark Newman, a “crapshoot” anyway.
However, when the Yankees selected high school shortstop Cito Culver in the 2010 draft, many amateur baseball pundits were puzzled at what they thought was a significant reach. Since his signing, he hasn’t hit at all, and this year at Charleston, he’s hitting .222/.330/.297.
The following article from Fangraphs just popped up in our news feed (located on the right-hand side of the page). This isn’t something you really want to read about your first round pick.
So what’s wrong with Culver? Maybe nothing as a scout I crossed paths with in Auburn, New York mentioned seeing him quite a bit as an amateur and considered Culver a better bet to reach the major leagues as a pitcher than position player. In hearing he popped the mitt at 92-94 MPH as an amateur, one has to wonder if the Yankees would consider pulling the plug on Culver the shortstop in favor of Culver the relief pitcher.
If Culver still has 92-94 MPH off of a mound in his arm, it would benefit the Yankees organization to make a move sooner rather than later. There may be value to salvage there, but it’s probably not as a position player. Sure, prospect followers may point to his age (19) as a reason to be patient with Culver. I’d use that same age to justify why a move to the mound should be made over the winter. The younger a prospect is, the more time he has to figure it out. Had Cito Culver not been a former first round pick, I would have labeled him a non-prospect and moved onto other players on the Charleston roster. Due to draft status, he will be afforded a much longer leash than a player of his true talent level probably deserves.
We would suggest reading the full article for more details, but this sure sounds discouraging.



20 Comments
Dellin Betances August 6, 2012 16:01
Whew! Taking the heat off of me is sure nice of Culver.
By the way, does everyone know I was drafted in the eighth round in the 2006 draft but still got a higher bonus than Cito Culver!
HAHAHA! Talk to my Anchor Banker he understands!
Dante Bichette Jr. August 6, 2012 16:02
Can I pitch too?
Cashman August 6, 2012 16:24
I suck.
The Truth August 6, 2012 16:34
Disturbing? No, fucking disgusting. Cashman and co should be ashamed of this. Crapshoot my ass imagine if an NFL team continually wiffed on first round picks the GM would be fired. Please don’t say it’s a different sport, incompetence knows no limits.
Faz August 6, 2012 17:06
“The truth” is that you don’t understand how the MLB draft works. When you draft in the NFL or NBA draft, you’re looking for players who can immediately contribute to the roster. In the MLB draft, the development time is much, much longer. There’s 5 to 6 levels of minor leagues that you have to go through before you hit the bigs. There’s much more room for error. Your scouts have to project what a kid will be like 4-5 years out. Completely different than the NBA and NFL.
It doesn’t excuse the shitty pick, but it’s not as “easy” as the NBA or NFL.
The Truth August 6, 2012 18:44
Fax sorry but there is no excuse for the Yankees continued ineptitude with the amatuer draft. The fact that they are toying with moving a position player to the mound is troubling. As for comparing the sports, the comparison can be made. If you draft a player in either the NFL or NBA by his second season you should be getting a return on your investment. In baseball if you are a first rounder shouldn’t you at least be in AA by now, not switching positions?
Seriously? August 6, 2012 22:00
No distinction between a drafted high school kid and a college kid three years older… nor between a high first round draft pick and a late first rounder? OK, whatever.
Routin Groundball August 7, 2012 19:12
No excuse? What if their dog ate their homework so they immediately picked the first player with a funky name?
Jim Leyritz's Cellmate August 6, 2012 17:12
And how many teams passed on Jeter? The baseball draft is much more of a crapshoot than in the NFL – it’s an unfair comparison.
Dellin Betances August 6, 2012 18:31
Hey idiot. Jeter was almost the 1st pick in the draft. The cheap Astros were afraid of his price tag so they chose Phil Nevin instead.
Look it up before you say 5 teams passed on him.
Minnie Minoso August 6, 2012 16:42
Hey, I can still play. Just give me a chance.
No Shit August 6, 2012 17:16
The Yankees are notroious at drafting poorly in the early rounds(as mentioned not really their fault, but they could still do better). One has to wonder if theyd even have taken Trout if they didnt sign Tex message.
Wouldn't Matter August 7, 2012 15:23
That wouldn’t matter since the Angels had back-to-back picks and selected him with the 25th pick of that year.
Cashman August 6, 2012 18:34
Hard to pay attention to the draft when I have to juggle extra martial affairs & abortions & extortion & working with the FBI to clean up my mess.
I mean being the yankee GM for 3 mil a year isn’t excited enough for me.
Apple August 7, 2012 21:56
I wish you’d “juggle” hand grenades.
Brian S. August 6, 2012 19:01
What a stinky
Every Non-Yankee Major League Scout Who Evaluated Culver in High School August 6, 2012 20:42
Told you so!
Smart Guy August 7, 2012 11:46
maybe I should be head of the draft, that year i wanted bryce bentz or nick castellanos, 2 guys they could have had
Dellin Betances August 7, 2012 15:19
Castellanos or Olt would be a great fill-in for A-Rod right now, wouldn’t they?
Yankee training & medical staff August 7, 2012 16:27
Culver has a bruise on his toe… he’ll just need a week of rest.
(one week later)… after getting an outside opinion, we are sad to announce that Culver’s toe was amputated at age 3.